All projects

Market analysis · Inside Airbnb

Legal holiday rentals in Barcelona

29 months of HUTB licences left (as of the snapshot, June 2026). In which neighbourhoods does a legal holiday flat really pay, and in which did it only seem to?

Cover of the report on the profitability of legal holiday rentals in Barcelona (in Spanish), asking in which neighbourhoods a legal holiday flat really pays.
Report slides are shown in their original Spanish.

Summary

Question
Where should the remaining HUTB licences be concentrated before November 2028?
Result
After correcting the metric, the total barely changes ($244.0M vs $241.5M), but the ranking of neighbourhoods does (rank correlation 0.31).
Tools and sources
SQL · Looker Studio · Inside Airbnb

15,293

active listings in Barcelona

6,520

HUTB flats with usable data

57%

of the universe excluded for price, licence or type of accommodation

$242M

estimated annual revenue of the legal HUTB market

The business question

Where should the remaining licences be concentrated before November 2028?

On 24 November 2028 every HUTB licence in Barcelona expires: the city's Special Plan does not renew them and Spain's Constitutional Court upheld the measure.

Who it is for: a holiday rental management company that has to decide today which flats to invest refurbishment, acquisition and staff in, and which to exit first.

Slide with the business question and key figures: 15,293 active listings, 6,520 HUTB flats with usable data, 57% of the universe excluded and $242M of estimated annual revenue.
The business question and the key figures. Figures in dollars, the currency Inside Airbnb uses for prices.

The market today

Fewer than half of the listings with a price have an HUTB licence.

Of 13,355 listings with a price, only 48.7% have an HUTB licence (7,195 listings, the ones that disappear in 2028). 25.4% are already seasonal rentals, a category that 2028 does not affect. 19.9% do not declare any information (not necessarily irregular).

The metric and its adjustment

Estimated annual revenue per flat.

Dataset formulaprice per night × (365 − available nights)

What it signals

The ceiling of gross revenue if every blocked night were a night sold.

What it is not

It is not profit (it does not deduct management, cleaning, commissions or taxes), nor actual occupancy.

Real case · a penthouse in Sarrià: $451 a night, 31 available nights, 0 reviews in 12 months, last review in April 2024 → $150,634 a year according to the formula. That one flat, on its own, made Sarrià look like the most profitable neighbourhood.

The adjustment · distrust the calendar

The calendar is replaced by occupancy estimated from the pace of reviews.

395 HUTB flats (6.0%) have their calendar closed for more than 200 nights and almost no reviews; 129 have none in 12 months. They contribute $29.5M a year with the dataset formula (12.1% of the market) and $1.3M with the review model.

Correlation between the two estimates of occupied nights: 0.15. In total they almost match ($244.0M vs $241.5M, 1%), but neighbourhood by neighbourhood they do not: rank correlation 0.31.

The funnel

From 15,293 listings to 6,520 comparable flats.

  1. 15,293
    Active listings in BarcelonaJune 2026 snapshot
  2. 13,355
    With a published price per night−1,938
  3. 7,195
    With an HUTB licence−6,160
  4. 6,548
    Entire home−647
  5. 6,520
    In neighbourhoods with 5 or more HUTB flats−28 (13 neighbourhoods)

The 13 excluded neighbourhoods add up to 28 listings.

Bar funnel: 15,293 active listings, 13,355 with a price, 7,195 with an HUTB licence, 6,548 entire homes and 6,520 in neighbourhoods with 5 or more HUTB flats, with the reason for each exclusion.
The funnel in the report, with the reason for each exclusion alongside.

Findings

Three groups, three mechanisms.

Map of Barcelona by neighbourhood showing estimated annual revenue per HUTB flat, darker for higher values, next to a table of the top ten neighbourhoods, led by Diagonal Mar.
The map. Annual revenue per HUTB flat, corrected with the review model, in the 48 neighbourhoods with 5 or more flats.
Top 10 · annual revenue per flat (corrected)
#NeighbourhoodRevenue per flat ($)Flats
1Diagonal Mar47,73973
2Sant Martí de Provençals45,97011
3la Dreta de l'Eixample45,5051,081
4el Fort Pienc45,311238
5l'Antiga Esquerra44,671378
6la Sagrada Família43,350559
7el Camp d'en Grassot42,777123
8la Vila Olímpica41,67265
9la Vila de Gràcia39,744461
10el Parc i la Llacuna39,69985

Median of the 48 neighbourhoods: $31,967. Between the first and the last, a 23-fold difference.

Eixample engine · confirmed by both metrics

5 adjacent neighbourhoods, 2,379 HUTB flats and an average of $44,700 a year per flat.

Dreta de l'Eixample, Fort Pienc, Antiga Esquerra, Sagrada Família and Camp d'en Grassot. None falls below $42,700.

Rising niches

Neighbourhoods the dataset undervalued: they climb between 8 and 26 places after the correction.

Diagonal Mar, Sant Martí de Provençals, Hostafrancs, el Camp de l'Arpa and la Salut. Diagonal Mar, with 73 flats, is the most solid and ranks first in the city.

Calendar traps

The ones that fall most after the correction.

El Besòs i el Maresme, Sarrià, el Clot, les Corts and la Verneda. Sarrià drops from $67,870 to $26,100 per flat; without the penthouse, $51,317.

Two scatter plots by neighbourhood, number of HUTB flats against revenue per flat: with the calendar proxy the cloud is scattered (rank correlation 0.16); with the review model it lines up (0.48) and the Eixample engine, the rising niches and the calendar traps separate.
The metric created the inconsistency, not the market. With the review model, the correlation between number of flats and revenue per flat rises from 0.16 to 0.48.

Triangulation

A private host with a single flat earns more per unit than a large portfolio.

A private host with one flat earns $47,021 a year; a portfolio of more than 20 flats, $31,077 (34% less per unit). The nightly price is flat ($285–298); what falls is occupancy, reviews and the superhost badge (from 55% to 15%).

By district

Eixample holds 3,073 of the 6,520 flats (47%) and the highest revenue per flat ($41,600). Ciutat Vella earns less than assumed ($31,116). Les Corts is where the calendar deviates most ($41,073 vs $26,460).

Limitations

What this analysis does not answer.

  1. It is gross revenue, not profit.
  2. The review model caps occupancy at 70% of the year: it underestimates the best performers.
  3. It is a snapshot from June 2026, not a time series.
  4. Averages for small neighbourhoods remain fragile (Sarrià and la Verneda: 6 flats).
  5. It is market intelligence: it does not replace a portfolio's internal data.

How to use it

Three decisions, each with its stopping rule.

  1. Focus retention on the Eixample corridor (2,379 flats).if the block's revenue per flat falls below $40,000 in the next snapshot, revisit the thesis.
  2. Test the niches before prices rise (Diagonal Mar, el Camp de l'Arpa).do not commit capital in neighbourhoods with fewer than 50 flats without confirming with your own data.
  3. Drop the neighbourhoods that only looked profitable from the plan.bring them back only if your own booking history contradicts the review signal.

Conclusion

The map of the business changes when you change how you measure it.

The $242M of the legal HUTB market is the same with either metric; what changes is which neighbourhood it is attributed to.

Why it is reliable: two estimates with different sources of error match in aggregate, and the disagreements fall where they were expected: in neighbourhoods with few flats.

Conclusion slide: “The map of the business changes when you change how you measure it”.
The report's conclusion.

Contact

I want to learn with your team and earn my place in it.

I am looking for an internship from February 2027 to learn with real data and contribute from day one.